Flowcrete’s Flowfresh coating achieves HACCP certification
THE ‘ultra-hygienic’ polyurethane flooring range Flowfresh has achieved HACCP International certification for the second time, with Flowfresh Cove included in the accredited collection for the first time.
This certification comes just over a decade since resin flooring manufacturer Flowcrete Group first combined the silver-ion based antibacterial agent Polygiene with a robust polyurethane coating, creating what is now the go-to choice of flooring for the food and beverage industry.
In fact, many of the Flowfresh coatings Flowcrete worked on a decade ago are reportedly still in place and said to be continuing to provide hygienic, reliable and safe surfaces for large-scale food production and processing operations around the world.
Flowfresh was developed to meet a demand in the food and beverage industry for a floor that would withstand the sector’s unique challenges. Without an adequate finish underfoot, food and beverage plants were vulnerable to a long list of unwanted costs and problems.
With an average life-span of about 15 years, food producers that have installed a Flowfresh finish know the facility is protected for the long-term against the costs and concerns of a failing floor.
Lifecycle cost considerations
The initially higher cost of installing a thicker, fit-for-purpose flooring solution can lead F&B businesses to opt for a cheaper alternative, however this logic often backfires and ends up costing the company more money over time.
This point was exemplified by a formula on lifecycle cost considerations devised by Flowcrete Group’s technical director, Grant Adamson.
The equation takes the initial expense of a floor and adds to it annual maintenance costs, such as cleaning, repairs and upkeep as well as the price of replacing a failed floor, including the costs incurred by shutting down production. The formula is:
- Lifecycle cost considerations (LCC) formula
- LCC = C + MPW + RPW
- The capital cost (C) of a project includes the initial capital expense for engineering, products and installation.
Maintenance (M) is the sum of all yearly scheduled operation and maintenance associated with floor repairs.
(R) is the replacement cost of a failed floor, including the financial impact of shutting down production.
When you take a 15-year view of flooring, the longevity of polyurethane makes it one of the cheapest materials available.
For example, on average a 1,000sq ft polyurethane plant floor will cost about USD11,000 over 15 years, whereas epoxies are typically USD12-13,000, carpet comes in at USD20,000 while vinyl flooring and linoleum can cost more than USD25,000.
In some circumstances, the cost of a floor failure can exceed even what the above formula is able to calculate. Here we are referring to when a food borne illness outbreak starts out as contaminant build-up in the hard to clean gaps and cracks of a deteriorating floor and from there goes on to infect produce en-masse.
This point was exemplified by the case of the cantaloupe producer Jensen Farms in Colorado, US, where dirty water on the floor was one of the main causes of a listeria outbreak that led to over 125 people from 28 states falling ill.
The overall cost of this incident was incalculable and resulted in the two owners of the business being sentenced to five years’ probation, six months home detention, 100 hours of community service and a $150,000 restitution fine.
This foodborne illness outbreak effectively illustrates the cost of not designing and maintaining a food safe facility is higher in the long run than the initial expenditure required to install high quality, accredited products.
Long-lasting antibacterial legacy
Flowfresh says it not only meets the strict standards of HACCP International but its antibacterial property goes beyond even this industry guideline by empowering it with the capacity to eliminate up to 99.9% of bacteria in contact with the floor.
The way Polygiene’s all-natural silver-ion technology is incorporated throughout the polyurethane matrix of Flowfresh means even after a decade and a half, the floor won’t have lost its bactericidal power, the company says.
This contrasts starkly with antibacterial treatments that rely on chemical coatings, which are prone to wearing away over time.
The permanence of Flowfresh’s bacteria killing property was put to the test when it was analysed according to the ISO 22196 standard, which measures the efficacy of antibacterial-treated surfaces. As part of this test, samples of Flowfresh were hot washed and abraded multiple times, over and above the ISO 22196 requirements.
This intensive abuse was undertaken to recreate the reality of what a floor in a food plant would be subjected to and Flowfresh apparently ‘more than proved that it was able to survive such conditions and maintain its superior hygiene credentials’.